I became interested in this camera when I saw the 880HD available at a department store for the same price. I went home, looked it up on the internet, liked the idea of this model with the swivel screen and regular AA batteries, so I bought it. The first test was indoors with incandescent lighting. As mentioned in the other review, the image was grainy, much worse than my old Flip Ultra purchased in 2007. It obviously doesn't have as good of lighting correction circuitry as the Flip. The next test was in the environment I intended it for, at an outdoor music festival. In this environment it performed well. It has a zoom that could get me a non-HD quality image when I was was sitting ridiculously far from the stage, something that my old non-HD Flip could not do. At more reasonable distances I still question whether it's really HD quality, but it was nice. Closer distances with little or no zoom were fine, and what I'd consider HD quality. When panning the image becomes a bit jerky, so maybe it could use some image stabilization circuitry too. But at $25 for the camera and $12 more for an 8G (about 2 hours of video) SD card and camera case, I really can't complain. I'm happy with the purchase, I can still use the old Flip for indoor and low-lighting use and did not have to break my budget to get better quality video for the use I intended the camera for. The attached video review is using this camera for the Martin Sexton performance at the 2012 Clearwater festival.
Sunday, November 2, 2014
Vivitar DVR-620 Compact HD High Density Digital Video Recorder with 180 degree Swival Screen and Fa
I became interested in this camera when I saw the 880HD available at a department store for the same price. I went home, looked it up on the internet, liked the idea of this model with the swivel screen and regular AA batteries, so I bought it. The first test was indoors with incandescent lighting. As mentioned in the other review, the image was grainy, much worse than my old Flip Ultra purchased in 2007. It obviously doesn't have as good of lighting correction circuitry as the Flip. The next test was in the environment I intended it for, at an outdoor music festival. In this environment it performed well. It has a zoom that could get me a non-HD quality image when I was was sitting ridiculously far from the stage, something that my old non-HD Flip could not do. At more reasonable distances I still question whether it's really HD quality, but it was nice. Closer distances with little or no zoom were fine, and what I'd consider HD quality. When panning the image becomes a bit jerky, so maybe it could use some image stabilization circuitry too. But at $25 for the camera and $12 more for an 8G (about 2 hours of video) SD card and camera case, I really can't complain. I'm happy with the purchase, I can still use the old Flip for indoor and low-lighting use and did not have to break my budget to get better quality video for the use I intended the camera for. The attached video review is using this camera for the Martin Sexton performance at the 2012 Clearwater festival.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment