- Provides the user to choose between wired and wireless connectivity options
- Streams top-quality instant movies and shows directly to your TV
- Instantly plays over 45,000 movies and shows from Amazon Video On Demand
- Start watching movies on your TV in seconds using high-speed Internet connection
- Compatible with any type of TV including earlier models
Here are the pluses, and the minuses, I have seen in the product after 2 months of daily use
Pluses:
1) Huge money saver: Having this box has allowed me to drop from 3 disks unlimited to 1 disk unlimited as well as drop cable entirely. The addition of Amazon on Demand is an even bigger value in that newly released movies will also be in abundant supply.
2) Ease of Set-up and use: I am a die hard apple fan because of their ease of use, and the set-up process was the easiest I have ever experienced. In less than 4 minutes I was watching a Netflix stream on my Sony HD TV. Also, the user interface is as straightforward as possible. A lot of thought went into it, and it shows. Bravo for one of the simplest interfaces I have ever utilized.
3) Clarity of picture: Unsrupassed and almost full HD. Often forget we are streaming over the internet.
4) It just works as advertised!
5) Customer Service: Video was skipping and contacted the customer service. You would never believe that a real live person answered the phone within 5 minutes on a Sunday night. Turns out it was a nework problem (see below). Amazing customer service!
Minuses:
1) The quality of your picture is tied to your internet speed. This has only been an issue once. My Charter Cable modem service averages above 4 meg downstream, but every once in a while the network performance drops. A call to charter fixed it. This is in no way an issue with the device, just something to be aware of. Check with your service provider on your speed before buying.
2) Direct Ethernet connection recommended for best picture: This is a limitation of my wireless network, but you may also have a similar set-up. My laptop has a G wireless card, and when it gets online the whole network slows down, and wireless video quality suffered. Solved it by using a direct ethernet connection, and recommend for everyone who is able to. Much more stable and very limited intereference.
That is my review to date. If you have Netflix and want to get Amazon on Demand there are few things that will be a pleasure to use and that will provide as much bang for your limited dollars. Thank you Roku, Netflix, and Amazon for such a wonderful product.I was already a rent-by-mail convert -switching between Blockbuster and Netflix for a couple of years. For an extra $99, this box has already piped in hundreds of hours of tv shows and movies, filling in the wait times between disks. The Netflix instant movie selection started out not great, but recently they have rotated in some big films like the Lord of the Rings trilogy, pop hits like Superbad, the original "Grindhouse" double feature package, as well as lots of older and more obscure releases for adventurous cineastes like me, with NO extra charge to a regular Netflix membership. The addition of Amazon streams will soon make a good thing even better, and more providers should be coming into the mix soon. I've had the player since its introduction in May, 2008, and I've gotten enough mileage out of it that if it blew up today, I'd have gotten way more than my money's worth.
I've heard a fair number of technical complaints from other owners, but mine hasn't even had a single glitch since purchase. With the exception of occasional problems at the Netflix servers, and rare errors in Netflix video encodes (for instance, they sometimes accidentally put the director's commentary track onto a video intead of the theatrical soundtrack, but I think they've tightened up the quality control recently in this respect), it JUST WORKS! In these economic times, there's a lotta bang for the buck in this tiny box!
UPDATE: It's July, 2012, and I'm still getting huge use out of the same little box after more than 5 years...the newer models are a little prettier, but don't offer any must-have features.
Read Best Reviews of Roku HD Player Here
This little box rocks. I have killed of all but my local channels on cable. This may have been the best $99. I have spent in years. My sons and I use it everyday. At first I was concerned about content, but there are like 12000 things to choose from...We have watched season 1,2 and in the process of season 3 of Heroes. You have no idea how cool it is to see shows like this with no commercials. Tons of movies to choose from. I really like the fact that the company has more than delivered on what they promised. I bought the box to add to my Netflix and now I can get amazon video on demand as well, and it didn't cost anything for the upgrade. How often has that happened...I am getting a ton more than I paid for. LOVE IT.February 18, 2012:Caution: Unsurprisingly in the world of consumer electronics and popular video media, in the interim since I wrote this review everything has changed. Not only has Roku introduced newer models offering many more channels of content, but Vudu no longer produces their own, dedicated hardware devices. In addition, the entire streaming playing field has shifted and evolved. In this context, my words and experiences have become extremely dated and are completely unreliable as the basis for a current buying decision. Read accordingly, please.
Over several weeks in September, I conducting a shoot-out between the Roku and the Vudu streaming video players with both connected to my AV system. My equipment included a recent-model 52" HDTV, a PS3 for playing BD, Comcast digital set-top box with HD subscription, and a fairly high-end integrated stereo tube amp with a couple of omni speakers positioned on either side of the TV. Eventually, I settled on the Roku and returned the Vudu to my local Big Box electronics store. Why?
Here are the criteria I used to make my decision, indicating which of the two systems came out ahead in each.
1) IMAGE QUALITY
There is no doubt that based purely on maximum video quality capabilities of each box, the Vudu wins hands down via its HDX option. While this provides near-BD quality picture and sound, the Vudu can only achieve this by pre-loading the program onto its internal drive, a process which takes a minimum of several hours following placing the order. While this is not strictly speaking streaming video, it is certainly the next best thing. It also appears that Vudu has more streaming/downloadable HD/HDX content than either Netflix or Amazon VOD. And in general, Vudu offers superior image quality to the Roku streaming options in both SD and ordinary HD.
This Vudu advantage is in my case significantly mitigated by my owning the PS3, which gives me high-quality playback of both BDs and upscaled DVDs. That is because through Netflix, along with my Watch Instantly cue, I have my by-mail DVD cue which I have upgraded to include BD where available for a nominal extra charge. More on that below.
Winner: On the streaming/downloaded video, Vudu is a clear winner; but factoring in the Netflix USPS cue, it becomes practically speaking and in my particular case a virtual tie.
2) SOUND QUALITY
Other online reviewers have reported that the Vudu HDX format offers the finest surround sound of any online system. Since I don't care about, and my audio set-up does not support, multi-channel sound, I did not compare the two systems on that criterion. I took the digital audio feed from both boxes via TOSLINK optical and input it into the stand-alone stereo DAC in my hi-fi. The sound clarity this way is phenomenal, with dialogue far more intelligible than with my former 5.1 system. Vudu claims superior support for advanced audio codecs, but of course that is only for streams and downloads--without factoring in the reference-quality audio available on the physical media accessed via a Netflicks mail subscription.
Winner: For my purposes, with my system, a tie.
3) CONTENT
Here is where it gets tricky. With 2000+ HD videos to stream/download, Vudu claims to offer the most HD content of any of the competing streaming services. This appears to be correct. I would also venture to say that compared to Roku, Vudu has taken care to ensure that all its streaming content, and its HD content in particular, is of a generally high quality. Having said that, however, the reality is that compared to Roku, Vudu is a one-trick pony, albeit it performs that trick extremely well. Like Apple, it has opted for a closed, proprietary stream, all hardware and software under one roof and closely integrated. It is this integration, coupled with its ingenious peer-to-peer video file-sharing technology, that affords Vudu a palpable edge in streaming video quality.
But wait. Through my Netflix subscription and my BluRay player, I have access to a far larger pipeline of HD content than any of the streaming services currently offer, and combined with the Roku player, these two pipelines are largely complementary. For $2 extra per month, Netflix automatically sends me the BD version of all movies when one is available--so far, if a BD version exists, I have received it. Between viewing these BDs and upscaled DVDs as they arrive, I am able to watch my Roku streaming queue, chosen from the thousands of top-notch documentaries, classic foreign films, and vintage Hollywood movies Netflix offers online. Many of these films are either not available anywhere in full hi-def or are are not dramatically enhanced by the full hi-def experience, so watching them in SD is not a great sacrifice. So far, the video streaming has been solid and glitch-free and the quality consistent and sufficient to be enjoyable, if not as thrillingly impressive as with the Vudu.
As someone who did not have a Netflix video-by-mail subscription prior to buying my Roku, I must say I am surprised at how well that service works for me. The Netflix online interface is fast, easy to use, and elegantly designed. Their phone-based customer service is refreshingly excellent, truly superb in my experience. The mail stream is fairly seamless and extremely well designed and implemented. My wife's and my viewing habits are such that we are not always chasing the latest releases the moment they become available, so we have thus far not encountered any issues with deferred fulfillment of movies in our mail queue.
As for the Amazon VOD, I have used it far less than I initially thought I would. This is because I have been frankly overwhelmed by the wealth of titles I have managed to cue up in my two Netflix streams; watching these leaves me neither the time nor the incentive to seek out additional content at additional cost. As for the MLB stream--well, I just haven't had time to check it out yet, my interest in baseball being rather limited.
Winner: If it were all about the amount of quality HD streaming content, then it would be Vudu, hands down. But for me clearly this isn't the case. My de facto hi-def stream is now my mail queue, which offers me far, far more variety than Vudu's HDX online stream, while the breadth and content quality of the Netflix SD online stream simply leaves Vudu's in the dust. What I thought initially was going to be a huge advantage for Vudu has in fact reversed into a huge advantage for Roku/Netflix.
4) CUSTOMER SERVICE
Vudu really shines here, in my experience. They employ knowledgeable, helpful support staff who communicate clearly and really engage to help solve issues and give useful advice.
After ordering my Roku online through Amazon, I was almost immediately presented with a fulfillment problem. My order was processed by Roku before I was able to update my shipping information, necessitating contacting customer service to try to implement the necessary changes before physical shipment. This turned into a real eye-opener: conflicting and universally unhelpful information and instructions from multiple personnel via multiple calls made necessary by being cut off while on hold for supervisors. Rote email replies from support staff who seemed either not to have read or not to have grasped the main content of my straightforward messages. My impression is that Roku's CS is not well designed for anything that is not clearly spelled out for their staff in a manual. In the end, I had to order a second unit with expedited shipping, then call Fedex to cancel delivery of the first unit.
Given that the media content of the Roku system carries the excellent customer service of Netflix (as described above), I can split the difference and call its overall CS experience middling. However, given the general solidness of the Roku platform and exceptional ease of setting it up, I suspect that most day-to-day support issues would be more apt to involve Netflix.
Winner: Nevetheless, based on my actual experience, I will give this solidly to Vudu. The company is clearly investing some of the premium price for their product back into this area, and it shows.
5) HARDWARE
Roku's self-contained little black box is a paradigm of simplicity and functionality. While the Vudu's RF remote enables users to hide the whole installation behind doors, many of us, me included, do not have that option. Besides, the small, lightweight Roku will fit in unobtrusively just about anywhere you have other equipment on an open shelf around the TV. With its PITA, optional-at-extra-cost outboard wireless receiver hooked up, the Vudu adds yet more wires and annoying blue lights to your AV center, as opposed to the Roku with its built-in wireless and single, discrete white power light.
The Roku is legendary for its ease of set-up, and that reputation is well earned. Although it comes with clear, simple instructions and all necessary parts and connectors, the Vudu does not quite achieve this. In fact, the Vudu's optional wireless kit includes a second unit which must be directly connected to your wireless router via a LAN port--a problem if your router has only a single LAN port and it is already in use, as was the case with mine. I had to hook up an ethernet switch just to try the Vudu out. Having said that, the Vudu hardware worked flawlessly once installed.
In conjunction with their elegant on-screen menuing interfaces, the remotes for both the Roku and the Vudu are models of intuitive functionality and minimalist design.
Winner: The Roku.
6) EASE OF USE
The user interfaces of both boxes can be divided into two components: on screen and online.
On screen, via the boxes: As mentioned, both systems are extremely well designed for on-screen functionality via their remotes. Navigation is simple, hierarchical, and intuitive, with both audio and visual cues. The big difference between the two is that with the Vudu, viewers are able to order all content directly through the main on-screen interface. For Roku viewers, on the other hand, only Amazon VOD content can be ordered direct from the box; Netflix content has to be loaded into the online queue using a computer and an Internet browser, at which point it is instantly available on the Roku.
Online, via computers: Although some may give great weight to being able to search and order the entire online library via the box and TV, in practice I have found it preferable to preload my queue through the browser. Reasons: speed, flexibility, access to full keyboard and mouse, ability to access outside review sites such as Rotten Tomatoes. Whether I do it in another room in advance or sitting in front of the TV with my laptop, it just works better for me. And online is where Netflix really beats the pants off Vudu. I was always somewhat put off by the Vudu website, which required me to buy the hardware and set up my account just to get full access to search their online movie database. I really don't get why they have imposed such a limiting restriction, effectively making it impossible for me to know what I am buying in advance. Once I did get access to it, I found the searching and linking capabilities left much to be desired compared to Netflix's system. No fuzzy searching, for one, meaning that if I didn't type a title with perfect spelling, I got no hits. Slower, less feature rich, less intuitive.
Netflix implements their dual queues (mail and online) elegantly and seamlessly through separate, parallel tabs in the same browser window. The Netflix artificial intelligence technology is remarkably effective at recommending new movies for me from a variety of genres based on my ongoing reviews of content I've already watched. If I have put a film into my mail queue and it suddenly becomes available online, I am automatically notified. Everywhere I am, I can navigate to a related action or area without losing what I've already got. Brilliant.
Even if I take away the mail queue factor, Netflix online is just so much more, and so much better, than Vudu online.
Winner: Roku for its being able to queue from the brilliant Netflix web site
7) COST
Hardware, for those who, like me, require wireless internet access and already own a BluRay Disc player to access true hi-def content:
Roku: $99.00 (with current free shipping offer)
Vudu: $225.00 ($150 plus wifi kit, but not including any local sales tax and cost of ethernet switch if required)
As well as allowing the viewing of rented streaming and downloaded movies, the Vudu player contains a hard drive that enables the owner to purchase movies from Vudu and store them permanently in the player to view at any time. The Roku player does not have this capability. However, I for one have no desire to own movies that are tied to a single piece of hardware such as the Vudu player.
Vudu rentals are pay-per-view only, with recent HD/HDX movies typically priced at $5.99. Roku/Netflix content is "all you can eat," i.e., a monthly flat-rate content charge. (However, if you choose to access Amazon VOD on the Roku, that content is, like Vudu's, mainly pay-per-view.)
Using the Netflix instant queue, the Roku owner is able to start any number of movies, pause them for days or weeks at a time, then pick them up again where they were left off. On the other hand, all Vudu and Amazon VOD rented content must be viewed within 30 days of rental, and once started, every rented movie must be finished within 24 hours.
The figures below are based on using the Roku strictly with Netflix content and no supplementary Amazon VOD. Amazon VOD's content charges are similar to Vudu's.
Content, based on viewing 10 hi-def movies per month:
Roku: $10.99 (Netflix "all you can eat" online plus one-disc-at-a-time basic BluRay by mail)
Vudu: $59.99 (via HD streaming and HDX downloads)
Content, based on viewing 20 hi-def movies per month:
Roku: $16.99 (Netflix "all you can eat" online plus 2-disc BluRay by mail)
Vudu: $119.98 (via HD streaming and HDX downloads)
When considering this comparison, remember that the Vudu costs are for EXACTLY ten and twenty recent BD-quality movies per month, and no other content; each additional HD or SD title viewed will increase the cost. On the other hand, the Roku costs simply guarantee the ability to view 10 or 20 desirable movies on BD by mail--both Roku options includes unlimited access to the entire Netflix online video library of HD and SD titles at no additional charge. IMPORTANT NOTE: I have calculated the maximum number of by-mail Netflix BD discs available under the two Roku options based on the postal turn-around times in my area (the Massachusetts South Coast); slower turn-arounds in your area will reduce your viewable BD content accordingly.
To clarify, the current generation Roku player cannot deliver BluRay quality video, while Vudu can, via HDX. To enjoy BluRay quality with Netflix/Roku, you have to own a BD player and have at minimum a one-disc-at-a-time BD Netflix subscription ($10.99/mo.).
Winner: Assuming you would not even consider the Vudu unless truly hi-def video were extremely important to you, the platform offering the best value will be highly dependent on whether or not you already own a BluRay player and whether or not the Netflix mail queue will work for you. My answer to both is "yes," and so the rather dramatic cost comparisons above pretty much speak for themselves: Roku hands down. However, if you don't already own, and don't plan to buy, a BD player, this obviously changes things drastically. In that case, Vudu's higher hardware costs and pay-per-view content fees will be greatly mitigated. Nevertheless, in the long term, adding a BD player to your mix and going with Roku/Netflix may well be more economical, particularly as the price of these players keeps coming down.
SUMMARY: Somewhat to my surprise, I found that by the end of the trial, I preferred the Roku/Netflix platform by a fairly wide margin. During the process, I determined that the ability to stream/download extremely hi-def content directly was not as important to me as I had previously thought. This is solely due to the Netflix mail queue working so well for me--something else I hadn't been expecting. Since the only compelling advantage of the Vudu for me--and its single greatest strength--is to deliver stable, super-hi-def online content, discovering a cheaper, more flexible alternative changed everything.
As always, YMMV.
BE SURE to check out the roku forums prior to purchasing this unit. This way you can see what issues others are having and if they are able to be resolved.
No comments:
Post a Comment