Showing posts with label audio recorder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audio recorder. Show all posts

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Q-See 4-Channel DVR with MAC Compatibility and 500 GB Hard Drive and Full D1 Recording QT454-5

Q-See 4-Channel DVR with MAC Compatibility and 500 GB Hard Drive and Full D1 Recording QT454-5Good price does what it says Cusomer support was excellent was able to use the old wiring and cameras recommended

I found it very confusing when I was looking for a DVR for my 4 camera setup. It appears that there are quite a few brands and they are all very similar. However, there are a couple of very important things you want. And this unit has them.

Full D1 recording at 30fps on all four channels at the same time. This is very important. Many DVDs will show live video at full 30fps at full 720p resolution, but when they record, they knock it does to 320 resolution, which is so tiny, you can't make much out in the video. This DVR has the processing power to show and record full 720p video at 30fps on all four channels.

Support for iPhone and Android video monitoring. This is very cool. I can check my cameras by loading up the app and can watch all 4 cameras to see what's going on. Did my Ups package arrive? Who's ringing my doorbell? I heard a noise, is someone at my back door? You can also play back the video and search for the motion activated events on any of the cameras. Very easy to use interface.

It has all the normal bells and whistles too. Motion activated camera settings with areas to block from motion detection. Email alerts with pictures on motion events ore alarm events.

I was very glad I had this when a kid who was running from the police threw a handgun in my backyard, and then two weeks later left a note on my door demanding his gun back. I was able to call police and show them video and pics of the kids with great shots of their faces and the car they were driving. They didn't come back after they saw my cameras. And I have peace of mind that I can watch my property from anywhere in the world.

Dont be confused by other DVDs and their misleading claims on specs. This is the DVR you want. Drop a Hard drive in and your set.

Buy Q-See 4-Channel DVR with MAC Compatibility and 500 GB Hard Drive and Full D1 Recording QT454-5 Now

I have had this setup and working for about 3 weeks now with 2 security cams connected (planning to add more later) and it has worked flawlessly so far. The new D1 spec is so much better quality than the lower resolution of the older DVR's. My favorite features are being able to view the cameras basically anywhere you can get a internet connection, and the search features for reviewing the recorded video with up 16X playback speeds is great! If you are not tech savy it will be a chore getting your surveillance system setup. You have to run cabling to cameras (unless you purchase wireless cameras), and if you want it accessible over the internet it will have to be connected to your internet router, and you have to install a hard drive in the DVR, etc. but Q-See has alot of documentation on how to setup the DVR up including a giant fold out poster size guide and of course a full manual on CD.

Read Best Reviews of Q-See 4-Channel DVR with MAC Compatibility and 500 GB Hard Drive and Full D1 Recording QT454-5 Here

Easy to install, networking a little bit tricky with ATT router 2Wire but anyway manage to reach all the cameras from the internet through Blackberry, iPhone 4, iPad and laptop.

Want Q-See 4-Channel DVR with MAC Compatibility and 500 GB Hard Drive and Full D1 Recording QT454-5 Discount?

product is good but amazon sent me the wrong cable for the hard drive and would not give me the right cable so i canceled the order i have no time to play games when they say on the website that the hard drive was good for this dvr but the cable was the wrong one no thanks

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Car Dashboard Video Camera Cam Accident DVR Full Hd Resolution , 2.0" Ltps TFT LCD Display

Car Dashboard Video Camera Cam Accident DVR Full Hd Resolution , 2.0' Ltps TFT LCD DisplayUnit turned off after 5 seconds. Internal battery would not charge. Manual impossible to understand. Ended up getting a Vacron for $300. After looking at other dashboard cameras, it appears that you won't get anything reliable until you get into the $300 range. The $29-$59 dashboard cameras all appear to be junk. Some people apparently get them working, but the vast number of bad reviews on most of them should have been a warning.

Suggest getting dashboard cameras that record in H.264 rather than AVI. AVI is "freeware" whereas for H.264, the manufacturer had to pay for that software which suggests that the rest of the system is equally high quality. If you don't really need a dashboard camera, any of them will work, but if you really want one you can depend on, you'll have to step up...

Just got it today. So far its working great. It took a little to learn the functions, nothing difficult. At the 640 setting the picture is clear, can read plate numbers. So far I'm impressed. I'm using a 2gig card, and am recording a total of 16 min in loop mode. I've ordered a larger card. So far I'm very happy, I will update after more testing. Thus far I would give the pic a 8, the sound a 6, and the mount a 5. At this point I would recomend this to a friend.

Buy Car Dashboard Video Camera Cam Accident DVR Full Hd Resolution , 2.0" Ltps TFT LCD Display Now

Sunday, August 31, 2014

ZMODO KDH6-DASFZ8ZN-1TB 16 Channel H.264 Security DVR (1 TB hard drive included) with 8 x 1/3" Colo

ZMODO KDH6-DASFZ8ZN-1TB 16 Channel H.264 Security DVR with 8 x 1/3' Color CCD IR Outdoor/Indoor Weatherproof Camera System - Professional ChoiceI purchased this system to keep an eye on my home while at work or vacation. Some planning before it arrived payed off and in only one day I had 6 cameras up and running. After a couple of calls to Zmodo the system was sending e-mails to my phone and I was viewing my home on the net. Nothing bad to say about the system. It performs well especially for the price. To say the cameras can see 80 ft. in the dark is a bit optimistic and if you wanted to make a blockbuster movie for the big screen this might not be the best choice but If you want to protect your home and have some peace of mind when you are away you can't do much better. The downs are few but include night vision that makes identifying faces difficult and a noisy fan on the dvr. My dvr is located in my bedroom and the noise is a little irritating. I am thinking about using a timer to only operate the system while we are not at home. This is not a big drawback for me because I purchased the system for when I am gone anyway. I suggest ordering an extra 50 ft. cable or two. Four of the eight cables are only 25ft! I managed to use two of them but compromised on camera location. I have added a couple of dome cameras inside and using one of the furnished outdoor cameras in the garage. The domes and the garage are the ones that trigger an e-mail due to leaves, birds, cars, etc. and so far not one false alarm. I am confident my home is protected and that was my goal. Amazon delivered as promised as they always do and i have no regrets about the purchase. I can truly say this is well worth the cost and time.

1 star for this DVR system because it sucks! i only bought it because it was on-sale and affordable, and i needed something cheap & quick. Seems like the DVR system has some kind of defect. The bullet cameras that came with it is great. 4 stars for that. The DVR system however, is my real problem! Not user-friendly, very difficult to understand and use the system, the instructions manual is garbage. Needs serious vocabulary improvements. (ENGLISH DAMMIT, ENGLISH!!!). the fan in the DVR box is noisy, and it (the DVR system) runs slow like an old jalopy computer infected with virus. Some of the buttons on the DVR box doesn't funtion, and the remote doesn't work. I have to do everything by using the mouse that came with it. Also, the other issue i have is with the time. i've set it to regular hours and not 24 hours mode, but it still show as 24 hour. For example, when the time is 12:59pm, when it turns 1 O' Clock, instead of displaying "1:00pm", it displays "13:00". Even with the time & date set to normal. It will take a while for an average joe to figure out how to use this DVR system. Eventually, after having this DVR system for almost a year now and messing around with it, i understand how it operates. Also, Zmodo Customer Service is horrible!!! 1 star for that also. Everytime i have an issue with my DVR system and tried to contact support, i either don't get the help i needed, or, i just don't get help at all! it's like they ignore you while you're waiting on the phone for half an hour already. Same for the 24 hour live support online. They will ignore you and eventually will send you a page telling you to leave your email and questions and they will get back to you, well, in this case, they never returned my email. i do not recommend this DVR system from this brand!

Buy ZMODO KDH6-DASFZ8ZN-1TB 16 Channel H.264 Security DVR (1 TB hard drive included) with 8 x 1/3" Colo Now

i love it but still dont know how to record to retive to set up user manual dont under stand i may have to pay someone to teach me not as easy to learn as vcr can someone show me ron twosocks53@yahoo.com

Read Best Reviews of ZMODO KDH6-DASFZ8ZN-1TB 16 Channel H.264 Security DVR (1 TB hard drive included) with 8 x 1/3" Colo Here

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Jazz DVK141 3.1MP Digital Video Camera (Red)

Jazz DVK141 3.1MP Digital Video CameraOrdered camera on gift card. Recieved the camera in a timely fashion, but it kept acting up. It would quit working and show low battery with new batteries, along with lights going on at the wrong time and generally odd behavior. The obvious thing to do was to ship it back for a trade in, but I'm as broke as it gets right now and couldn't afford return shipping. So, having limited choices I chose to open it up, voiding any return claim. since the front lens parts seem to be glued on, it wouldn't open all the way, but would pry apart enough to see the problem. The positive lead from the battery box had been pinched in between the case and the metal memory card cover during assembly, and was apparently grounding out on it. Long story short, moved the lead, put it back together, works fine. So I have a camera and a small adventure.

Saturday, August 16, 2014

Ematic EM638VIDGR Touch Screen MP3 Video Player with 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recording

Ematic EM638VIDGR Touch Screen MP3 Video Player with 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recording
  • 8GB Flash Memory
  • 3 inches Touch Screen Display
  • 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recorder
  • FM Radio and Recorder
  • Durable Aluminum Body

We bought these for our daughters. Great product! The touchscreen is a little touchy and would work better with a plastic stylus, but other than that they are great! Big enough for them to use and not hit the wrong button!

Buy Ematic EM638VIDGR Touch Screen MP3 Video Player with 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recording Now

Frozen solid. Stuck during the embedded video on how to use and enjoy this MP3 player.

Did get to briefly listen to the FM radio prior to freeze up and sound was actually pretty good. Never got to load songs into it as it froze and there was no way to shut it down or reboot it.

Can not confidently recommend this item.

Read Best Reviews of Ematic EM638VIDGR Touch Screen MP3 Video Player with 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recording Here

this is a GREAT mp3 player it is not cheap it is good for children 2!! BUY THIS ITEAM it is worth EVER DIME!!!! [[ASIN:B0076E2DHQ Ematic EM638VIDGR Touch Screen MP3 Video Player with 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recording]

Want Ematic EM638VIDGR Touch Screen MP3 Video Player with 5MP Camera with LED Flash and Video Recording Discount?

Em uma semana já estava com o produto. Produto bom. Pena que não lê pdf. Conversão de arquivos é rápida.

Pros Looks and sounds good on paper // realatively inexpensive

Consset up is lousy/ on screen buttons too small for how no accurate the touch scrren is // reaction time is slow

I bought 3 ematic products for christmas gifts after receiving them and opening them returned them all. They simply were note worth the trouble, eventhough they were not that expensive. Mysuggestion look up Ipod on craigslist

Friday, July 18, 2014

Polaroid CAA-03040 Digital Video Camera

Polaroid CAA-03040 Digital Video CameraI just picked up one of these and since there wasn't a real review yet, here are my initial thoughts. Considering the price, I bought this with low demands and expectations. It's very easy to use. I had no problem connecting it to my computer. Recording quality is good enough if I'm outside or in a well lit room but otherwise it's useless. This isn't for rooms lit with a lamp or two. That shouldn't be too shocking though. Still pictures are coming out blurry. This won't be replacing my digital camera anytime soon. The usb cover is held on by a very flimsy piece of rubber. That'll break off in no time. I like the screen. It flips around so you can see yourself as you record, if you're into that kinda thing. Sound quality was better than I expected. It picks up a lot of noise but it works. It only comes with 16mb of memory so unless you want about ten seconds of video you will need a memory card. When I got home I picked up a 1gb sandisk card here on amazon for about $15. great deal. Overall, I think I got my $79 worth. I think this would be a great starter camera for a kid, or for someone on a budget like me who just wants to share some nonsense online with friends. I hope to have fun with it on my trip out west.

What a disappointment! 20 seconds of video on the internal memory. The Flip video gets an hour! We bought a 1g memory card for 20 minutes of video. But the darn camera turns off if the memory card is inside!! Totally useless and I can't return it because I bought it in Sept for a Christmas present and the return time is over. Polaroid should be ashamed.

Buy Polaroid CAA-03040 Digital Video Camera Now

I own the Flip Video and thought I would try the Polaroid because it allows for expansion via SD cards. The images were awful. It took a long time to figure out how to use it while the Flip had excellent quality in all light conditions and I was up and running within 5 minutes. The flip comes with excellent software and I can't even tell what the Polaroid software does because every time I opened it all it said was it could not connect to my device. Also, the Polaroid went through my batteries in less than 30 minutes and I had to change them twice. I was able to use the same batteries in my Flip video camcorder. For me, one is excellent and the other is garbage. Either I could not figure out how to use this or it is an absolute piece of junk. Assuming I did everything correctly then then I would say this product should not have been made. Maybe I messed up but I do not see where. I say get the Flip. It is fantastic.

Read Best Reviews of Polaroid CAA-03040 Digital Video Camera Here

Whoever says this camera has good video/photo quality really has to have their eyes checked.

This is by far the worst camera I've ever laid hands on. Shame on Polaroid for putting their name on a piece of junk like this.

Not even my 8 year old wants it, that's how bad it is.

Do not believe anyone on here who says this is a pretty good or pretty decent camera, it's just not true.

My Panasonic DMC-TZ1 camera takes better videos then this with more detailed quality.

If you don't believe me go ahead and try this Polaroid joke. I bet you will regret buying it.

As for me, I'm getting rid of mine as soon as possible.

Hope this review helps anyone who really wants a "TRUE" review.

Want Polaroid CAA-03040 Digital Video Camera Discount?

This is a good basic video camera. Some problems I found are the resolution is no better than a digital camera and it can't use SD cards larger than 2Gb. This limits you to 15-20 minutes of video with an SD card. Internal memory is good for only 20 seconds of video.

I bought this with a 4Gb SD card. The camera tries to start but then just shuts down with no indication of what the problem is. I put the 4GB SD card into my Kodak EasyShare camera and it works fine. I used the 2Gb from my Kodak camera in the Polaroid and everything works. The video from the Kodak EasyShare is just as good, works better in low light and it supports larger SD cards for longer videos.

Last problem, the tripod mount is very shallow. You'll need several washers between the tripod and the camera.

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Panasonic PV-D4761 DVD/VCR Combo

Panasonic PV-D4761 DVD/VCR Combo
  • Space-saving combination DVD player and 4-head, hi-fi stereo VCR
  • Optical digital audio output passes Dolby Digital and DTS 5.1 surround signals to compatible AV receivers and speaker systems
  • VCR's Commercial Skip feature lets you hop past commercials
  • S-video and component-video DVD outputs; shared DVD/VCR composite-video output
  • Measures 16.9 x 4.6 x 14.9 inches (W x H x D)

The first bad thing about this unit is the manual, which is so poorly written that Panasonic wisely added a tech support number at the end of it. Since I'm reasonably handy with electronics, I got it set up after about 30 minutes without tech support, but found that I was having difficulty accessing the DVD special menus and chapters. After about 2 hours of frustration, I gave up. On calling tech support the next day, they informed me that the machine was probably defective. The DVD player was making a whirring noise on startup, and was skipping on audio CD's to boot. Add to that the fact that the "illuminated remote control" is misleading advertising. Only a handful of basic functions are illuminated (unless my remote was malfunctioning too -a distinct possibility). The picture quality, (the little I saw of it) seemed fine. CD's played on the DVD sounded tinny, although the sound on the 15 minutes of DVD I got to watch seemed good. Most of all, the manual and the layout of the remote were too confusing for words. It couldn't be any worse!

Buy Panasonic PV-D4761 DVD/VCR Combo Now

I'm very proficient with electronics and even I had problems reading through the instruction manual I gave up after 2-3 minutes and hooked it up without it. It was easy enough. This DVD/VCR combo has every feature you could want including 5x search forward & backward, this was great especially with the DVDs. There are two disappointing facts however: the lighted remote only lights 8 keys NOT including numbers, volume or channel keys. Also the VCR picture quality was miserable in comparison to the Phillips DVD/VCR (but the Phillips ate my VCR tape, I didn't try another). This was very disappointing coming from Panasonic but I've experienced poor picture quality with their VCR PV-8664 as well. so much so I'm returning it this eve. I paid ... at PC Richards here in NY over priced due to poor picture quality, poor manual, and only eight keys lighting on the remote, but you've gotta love the features (though not enough to keep it).

Read Best Reviews of Panasonic PV-D4761 DVD/VCR Combo Here

Basic set up to replace an existing vcr is simple and straight forward. Manual is extensive and could be inproved but info is all there. Unit seems very well made. Performance and controls are very good. The Panasonic CT-27D11 might be a good match to get the most out of this unit.

Want Panasonic PV-D4761 DVD/VCR Combo Discount?

The item has performed very well. Needed something to play VHS and DVD for the kids and I only had limited space. The machine is easy to use and the front A/V inputs make it easy to hook up a video camera to watch home movies.

all in all we are very satisfied.

I didn't get one of these players, a friend has this one and I recently got time to use it.

The DVD playback is decent and so is the VHS. Although this DVD player alone wouldn't sell for much... and the VCR would'nt sell for much either..

The truth is that I really don't get the point of this. heres why... 1)Most people who bought this already owned a VCR so buying the extra VCR is pointless. 2)Its more expensive, You can easily pick up a decent DVD player and a VCR less then you're paying for this.

I understand that you're saving the hassle of all the wires and its looks more neat and compact this way, but is it really worth the money?

My advice: Just buy a DVD player. if you have a VCR with a bunch of VHS movies.. great keep them, you'll still have the VCR to watch them. If you don't have a VCR then most probably you don't own any VHS tapes, in this case, still buy the DVD player, DVD's are the future VHS is fading out fast and you probably won't buy a VHS anyway if you get a DVD/VCR. If you don't have a VCR and own VHS tapes then go with one DVD and one VCR you can save some money if you go this way.

Monday, April 7, 2014

Pioneer BDP-330 1080p Streaming Blu-ray Disc Player (Black)

Pioneer BDP-330 1080p Streaming Blu-ray Disc Player
  • Internal Audio Decoders: The BDP-330 features internal decoding of all advanced audio formats including Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby TrueHD, DTSHD High Resolution, and DTS-HD Master Audio.
  • Wireless Ready: An optional 802.11n wireless adapter (AS-WL100) is available allowing access to online wireless content and firmware upgrades without the need to run additional cables to your Blu-ray Disc player
  • Dual USB Inputs: A front and Rear USB input are provided to accommodate optional BD-Live Storage, our optional AS-WL100 Wireless internet adapter, or JPG/MP3 media playback.
  • Multi-Format Compatibility: You can play High Definition DVD discs recorded by digital video cameras in AVCHD format. You can also play BD-R/RE, DVD-R/RW, etc. recorded using Blu-ray Disc recorders or DVD recorders as well as CD/CD-R.
  • HDMI Precision Quartz Lock System (PQLS) Jitterless Transmission (Bitstream): By HDMI connection with a compatible Pioneer A/V receiver, A/V sources such as Blu-ray Discs and DVDs, as well as CD music are precisely reproduced with minimum jitter.

UPDATE: Netflix was added via firmware on roughly 8/14

The news of Pioneer's departure from the plasma market shook the AV community a little over two years ago. Questions abound as to what the future would hold for Pioneer in a post Kuro world. Fans of their Blu-ray players begun in earnest with the 51FD/05FD wondered if a joint venture with Sharp would lead to a dilution of the high quality A/V performance at a very reasonable price point. The release of the budget-priced Pioneer BDP-120 was to some a harbinger of this venture manifesting itself in what appeared to an amateur eye as a largely re-badged Sharp player veiled beneath a Pioneer chassis. Its performance was nowhere near its 320 and 23FD brethren and its price point reflected such.

Emerging news of the 320's replacement came from European sources boasting Youtube streaming, which hinted the promise that US customers might get Netflix streaming or even some of the other instantly streamed video sources. The BDP-330 was largely unannounced until I found one in a Best Buy half-an-hour's drive from my house.

Upon lifting the all-white box, I noticed immediately that it was light, which caused me to prolong any disappointment until I got an opportunity to put it through its paces. I was a bit surprised the box made no mention of Youtube or any streaming services. Upon unboxing the player, I was a bit surprised at how small and shallow its profile really was. It makes the 320 look downright large. The biggest immediate disappointment was the rear output panel, which was identical to the European press photos completely devoid of multichannel analogue outputs. The Burr-Brown DAC-equipped MCH analogue outputs were one of the 320's strongest selling points. The player was made in April of 2010 in China; please note this is a departure from the Malaysian-built 320 and later 51s. The 120 was also made in Sharp and has a number of rear panel similarities including the power cord input's design. The player also shares the exact same model number remote as the 120 VXX3351, which appears nearly identical to the 320, but including some strangely labeled buttons (page +/and keylock) missing the video adjust button (this all but eliminated the hope that this might be a "real" Pioneer for me).

Upon firing up the player, I was greeted by the familiar Pioneer menu, but a very different setup menu that was very similar to the 120 best I can remember. Here's where the disappointment turns real: there is no Netflix; only Youtube and RSS. Gone is the slicky black background menu and appeared is the simple text and icon menu I remember from Sharp players. No choice for colorspace or high-speed HDMI...Just resolution. For folks who have been accustomed (spoiled) by the amount of tweaking possible with the 320/23/51/05, this is a huge disappointment.

All video adjustments options of the 320/23 are GONE. No Preset modes like Pioneer PDP or Projector. Once again, just resolution. This player is certainly not of the linneage of the current 320 or 51 with their extensive picture adjustment menus and presets. From this standpoint, the 330 is very disappointing.

In respects of load times, the quick start feature added very little discernable benefit to load times, that were very pokey. In fact, the current 320 was faster in actual load times in all the discs I tested than the 330. Other than the 2 second power off eject time, the Pioneer BDP-330's load times were embarrasingly so for a 2010 player whose peer group can load the same discs in a third of the time.

Player Eject Dark Knight Casino Royale POC I Coin POC 1 -Disney Castle Total Speed

Pioneer BDP-320 18 36 36 39 62 191 5.5

Pioneer BDP-23FD 18 36 36 39 62 191 5.5

Pioneer BDP-51FD 33 45 44 39 73 234 4.5

Pioneer BDP-330* 2 39 34 47 63 185 5.5

* with quickstart engaged

In testing deinterlacing capabilities with synthetic test suites, the Pioneer BDP-330 did not establish itself as a stand-out by any means. Its performance was very similar tot he BDP-120 in failing to recognize most of the film cadences. In video-based tests, jaggies were prolific and the moire in S&M's speedometer test was the worst I have seen save the Sony BDP-N460, S470, S570, and S370.

Realworld testing was bit more kind to the player. While the upconverted image was not as sharp as the 320, it was compotent on most test material devoid of choppy edits. My biggest complaint is the utter lack of video adjustments for dvd. There are simply no adjustment menus or sub-menus, which is the antithesis of the elaborate and detailed adjustment options available in the current 320.

Deinterlacing Performance using S&M Test Disc:

Test 2:2 2:2:2:4 2:3:2:3 (PF-T) 2:3:2:3 2:3:3:2 3:2:3:2:2 5:5 6:4 8:7:8:7 24p pass Time-adjusted

Pio 320 pass fail pass pass* marg fail marginal fail marginal pass fail

Pio 120 pass fail pass fail fail fail fail fail fail pass pass

Pio 330 pass fail pass fail fail fail fail fail fail pass fail

Value/Overall:

With sluggish load times, just above average dvd quality, a lack of built in wirless connectivity, youtube and rss streaming only, no multi-channel analogue outputs, no picture adjustments, and non-3D capable, it's hard to argue why this player should cost more than $100 in this market. Even then, it's hard to argue why someone would purchase this player at all unless they are hell-bent on a pioneer fascia and youtube. Firmware and time may bring Netflix and other streaming options, but there are many other players that offer so much more for so much more less. With an MSRP appears to be a very lofty $299, I would encourage folks to explore a combination of two players like an LG BD550 and a Pioneer BDP-320 for nearly the same price and would be a perfect marriage of excellent AV playback of optical media (320) and excellent streaming options (550). All in all, this player is a massive disappointment to followup on the great performance and value the 320 offered.

Buy Pioneer BDP-330 1080p Streaming Blu-ray Disc Player (Black) Now

I was expecting a product to manufactured to the traditional Pioneer standards. Unfortunately, I was grossly dissapointed. Two things that are very annoying: To open and close the drive you have to either use the remote or push the tiny (and I mean TINY) button. After inserting the disk, in order to get the disk to play you must then push the tiny button and then the play button (unlike the BDP-23FD which allows you to push the play button and then the Blu-Ray player closes the door for you.

Also, the mechanism is noisy and the cycle time to go from on to door open is LONG. There are other blu-ray players. I suggest you spend your money wisely and not purchase this one.

Read Best Reviews of Pioneer BDP-330 1080p Streaming Blu-ray Disc Player (Black) Here

I was very disappointed with this unit out of the box. I bought it so that it could use the iPod app with my AVR. It was the slowest player I had seen in many years. Loading a disc was rediculous and long delays before it would respond to functions like eject made it almost impossible to tolerate. I checked for an online update using the Internet connection built into the unit. Nothing was available. I finally went into the system menu and did a full reset on the unit. IT NOW WORKS GREAT! The main page is now different. I believe that the unit had an update at the factory but did not take because it needed a reset. Like when a computer is restarted after a software update. It is now fast to load discs and the command responses from the eject button and remote are great.

Want Pioneer BDP-330 1080p Streaming Blu-ray Disc Player (Black) Discount?

The product was easy to hook up,and to run though the set up. It took a little long to load disk and got quite noisy but overall not to bad. Had a few screen size issues.

I replaced my Sony BDP-S560 with this new Pioneer Bluray player. The main reason was to match my new Pioneer VSX-1120-K receiver and it does so perfectly. I do like the button, drawer and display layout of the Pioneer over the Sony. As far as function, speed and performance goes, it is at least as good as if not better then the Sony especially in the speed (on, loading and shutoff) department. Hopefully, it will continue to work fine and last a long time. One thing it does not have that the Sony does have is built in wireless. However, Pioneer is supposed to come out with a wireless Lan adpater (hopefully wireles N and affordable, i.e. almost free) that plugs into the rear USB port. Still, for the money, the adapter should have been included with the unit (almost did not give it a four star rating because of this).

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Yamaha BD-S1065BL Blu-Ray Disc Player

Yamaha BD-S1065BL Blu-Ray Disc Player
  • Connects to the internet to access the fun and informative features tha BD-Live provides
  • For all HD formats
  • 1080 playback for DVDs, photos and personal video data
  • On-screen display GUI
  • Extensive disc / format compatibility

When Dorothy and crew approached the castle of the infamous Wicked Witch of the West, she encountered a old, dilapidated wooden sign that read . . . "I'd go back if I were you", and this expresses my sentiments perfectly for anyone considering the Yamaha BD-S1065 Blu-Ray Player. As a diehard Yamaha fan, I truly wish that I could offer prospective buyers of the Yamaha BD-S1065 something 'positive' about this particular player, because I've been a staunch supporter/consumer of all things 'Yamaha' for many years. The fact is, they make some of the finest home "audio" components available anywhere, but I'm afraid the same cannot be said of their "video" gear including the BD-S1065.

Let me say at the outset that I own the Yamaha RX-V863BL A/V (home theatre) receiver ($600) and its an awesome unit! I also own a full line-up of Yamaha home theatre speakers including the Yamaha NS-C444 center speaker ($150), two Yamaha NS-B750 bookshelf speakers ($1200/pair), and a Yamaha YST-SW315 sub-woofer ($250), all of which operate flawlessly for me. So it seemed to make perfect sense to trust in the purchase of a new Yamaha BD-S1065 blu-ray player ($400) for our developing home theatre system. But unfortunately, that trust was completely shattered when I connected and evaluated the BD-S1065.

The first unit I received had more problems than I care to articulate (right out of the box), but the single most troublesome flaw was that it took the player "eons" to load a new (standard issue) blu-ray disc. I mean it took literally 4-5 continuous minutes of scanning the disc before anything at all appeared on the television screen, and even then, it would re-enter yet another secondary "reading" phase that made the unit completely unusable in practical terms. I tried it on multiple discs of variable manufacture, and it misbehaved the same on each and every one of them. However, it also had a grossly outdated version of firmware, so being the optimist that I am (i.e., thinking that this might be the source of the problems), I foolishly went to the trouble of downloading the newest version of firmware from the Yamaha website to a CD/R disc via home computer and then transferring the new firmware to the BD-1065. Unfortunately, despite the firmware update, the problems all continued. In fact, some additional issues arose after the update including completely random stoppage of blu-ray discs right smack in the middle of viewing a movie (almost like a screensaver event)! Weird! Very-very weird. And significantly, the faulty behavior could not be duplicated using the same discs with a PlayStation 3 (PS3) or other (Samsung) blu-ray player.

Fortunately, Amazon has always been great about returns, so I sent the unit back for a replacement. A week later, the second (new replacement) BD-S1065 arrived, so I plugged it in (just as before). To my utter dismay, all of the same issues or problems with the first unit were present with the 2nd (replacement) unit including protracted load times, excessive and multiple disc readings, random stoppage of the disc in the middle of playback, etc., etc. And believe me, the list of headaches goes on from there! In each instance, I used brand new blu-ray discs all of which played without incident on a blu-ray equipped PS3 and similar Samsung unit, and in each instance, I was able to repeat the problem by returning the disc to the Yamaha BD-S1065. End of story.

Bottom line? This unit is NOT worth considering for your blu-ray needs. Sorry Yamaha, but I'd recommend that people look elsewhere for their blu-ray needs.

Buy Yamaha BD-S1065BL Blu-Ray Disc Player Now

We all love a bargain and that's what this otherwise lofty-priced blu ray player appeared to be when its price recently dipped below two benjamins. In my ever-ending quest to test almost every blu ray player, I purchased one with reasonable hopes. Yamaha debuted this player at nearly $600 and thought it might be a capable performer with a bit too demanding a pricetag (a la the Denon DBP-2010CI). A few "professional" reviews had scored the player reasonably well in traditional AV quality, which led me to believe this player might be akin to the apparently higher end funai-built machines badged as Marantz, Onkyo, and Denon.

Upon unboxing the player, my hopes were high in feeling the heft of the player. The player has an old-fashioned profile and weight similar to the larger Funai-built players. Connectivity on the rear panel is very good with Multi-Channel Analogue outputs, dedicated, down-mixed stereo outputs, usb hub, Ethernet connection and the usual video offerings. Upon powering up the player, I was astonished at how slow it was to boot. It dragged on for quite a while reaching the 30 second-ish purgatory of the Pioneer BDP-51FD's boot time. The flash menu was a partial image of an open piano showing its strings that added a nice, unique touch. Once the setup menus appeared, I began to get an eerie feeling as to some of the origin of this player. The menu's graphics and test is very simple and lacks the refinement of a Pioneer, Oppo, or even Sony frankly.

The quick start was the first worry that this was less of a Panasonic-based Funai player and something different. After configuring the internet connection, I was disappointed to realize that firmware can only be updated via the rear-mounted USB hub. This is as convenient as an ashtray on a Harley. After yanking out the player from my rack and downloading the firmware, I updated the player to the May firmware described to resolve playback issues with new discs including Avatar. The whole process took roughly five minutes. The lack of the ability to download firmware via the internet connection is really problematic considering most of us do not want to have yank out a player of the rack each time it needs a new firmware update.

The Sharp-esque quick start feature did have a significant impact in powered off eject time, dropping it to a reasonable 2 seconds. That said, I could hear the fan blow while this player was in its idle state and can only believe that the activation of quick start would release an innocuous electricity leech in your rack.

The configuration of the video and audio was relatively straight-forward, but disappointing in the utter lack of video adjustments. Outside of resolution, the image is effectively unalterable from the native state. There are no adjustments for colorspace, noise reduction, brightness, etc. You get what it puts out and that's it. While adjustments are not necessary, they seem nearly obligatory for a unit whose MSRP alone suggests a more refined AV experience. Image quality of blu ray is excellent, but not very different from any other blu ray player (including a $100 discount player) for 1080p 24fps sources. Colors seemed very accurate with skin tones avoiding warm or jaundiced looks. Motion was smooth and did not notice any unusual errors in depiction. DVD image quality was reasonable, but lacked the detail and subtle edge enhancement that could be found with a Pioneer BDP-320. While the image generally avoided deinterlacing errors and was moiré free, it was a bit less than convincing as a "well-upscaled" image to the naked eye. Synthetic tests showed it did well with 2:2 and 2:3:2:3 (PF-T) cadences, but was easily tripped up by the majority of other film cadences. This performance was consistent with Sharp-based players (ie Pioneer BDP-120 and BDP-330). As you may have inferred, I believe this player (and its big brother the BDP-1900) are based in part upon Sharp designs. I have no conclusive proof other than the menu layout and design, inclusion of a quick-start feature, firmware via usb, and video performance.

In regard to disc playback, I noticed a few gremlins that are sadly very Sharp-esque. During playback of a Netflix copy of "The Way of the Gun" audio began to drop-out and the video stuttered, ultimately locking up the player. I tested the same scene of the blemished disc on my Pioneer BDP-320 and Oppo BDP-80, which played it without even the slightest hesitation or interruption.

Analogue audio setup was relatively easy and I found the analogue output adequate, but far from arousing. I found analogue audio similar to the Sony 1000ES, but not nearly as rich as the Burr Browns in the Denon 2010 or the Pioneer BDP-320.

At the end of the day, the $200 player marketplace has gone from budget to rife with excellent performers that include streaming, wireless connectivity, and even 3D capability. This player's only merit is traditional AV playback, which candidly it fails to establish itself as an above average performer let alone near the highly discounted Pioneer BDP-320 or Sony BDP-S1000ES. Sadly, even at $200, there are a number of better options.

Read Best Reviews of Yamaha BD-S1065BL Blu-Ray Disc Player Here

The player works just fine after loading the free firmware update from Yamaha. Price has dropped considerably in the last several weeks. Shop Best Buy for open box specials which are going for as little as $90.00, however ignore Best Buy HDMI cable push. Way over priced. I got a 6 foot cable on Amazon for .98 cents. Avoid buying player on-line unless shipping is free. No flashing lights or pin wheel sparklers to entertain the kids but who cares. A little slow on startup so instant gratification doesn't apply. Excellent Blu-Ray player.

Want Yamaha BD-S1065BL Blu-Ray Disc Player Discount?

I wanted a Blu Ray player that worked well and did not look like a toy pulled from a box of Cracker Jacks. Sony, Panasonic, LG, they all havethis cheap plastic lightweight look and feel. I also spent a lot of time on the web looking at reviews of Blu Players and found few that really held up under end user reviews. I was hesitant on this player because the reviews were fair on average with complaints of slow loading,etc. But I do not care about streaming off the web and my movie collection is all DVD so I cannot comment on Blu Ray. I do have a Sony Internet LED TV and wanted the quality of a player to match.

First, it looks like a real fine piece of equipment and it has a smooth feel about the operation and it actually has some real weight to it indicating high end build quality that Yamaha has a reputation for in audio equipment. It is simple to use and it up-converts newer high end DVDs to 1080P extremely well and sound reproduction is tops, since I am hard of hearing due to Meniere's Disease sound output over headphones is critical. In short, I got what I wanted, a high end looking player that does the job very well for what I need from it. I will purchase a couple latest releases of Blu Ray movies "Stargate" and "Twelve Monkeys" to see how it performs on Blu Ray. As for today's computer graphic extravaganzas such as "Avatar," I have no interest so this player should serve me well for years to come.

The only complaint so far is Yamaha's rather crude means of updating firmware. Had to create three separate accounts before I could login and retrieve the updates. Once that was done, updating was quite easy via a USB Flash Drive.

UPDATE #2: Not having it. Yamaha hasn't bothered to call me back and I'm doubting whether I'll get resolution before I can no longer return it. So in the box and back it goes. So long Yamaha. I really wanted to like this thing, too.

------------------------

UPDATE #1: One week after owning this unit, I learned it doesn't play AVCHD encoded DVD's like the dead Panasonic unit did. The book says it will, it has the AVCHD logo on top of the unit, but it just complains it can't read the disk and then the disk ejects. I contacted Yamaha, who confirmed the firmware was current and then had to escalate to tier 2 support. Not liking my odds with this one at this point. Perhaps another Panasonic is in my future...

------------------------

I'm writing this as a real-time setup review. I unboxed the unit and placed in the footprint of a dead Panasonic BD player. This thing dwarfs it. It's several inches deeper that the newer "slim-line" models being produced by the bigger players. I, however, liked the larger appearance of the Yamaha... more substantial and not so toy-like looking.

I powered it up and went through the menu system briefly. It defaulted to the proper settings, 16:9, HDMI, etc. My daughter was awake, so first up: The Princess and the Frog. No trouble. Played properly. Next up: Toy Story 3. Never loaded, just sat a black screen. Firmware update I thought?

It's no secret that Yamaha (or whoever really makes this unit) makes it tougher than most to update. The LAN connection is strictly for BD-Live, and that's a real shame for those of us with a fully wired home. Yamaha should realize folks interested in overpaying for a BD player that does little more than play from disk just might like to download the updates via Ethernet. But whatever. I loaded up a USB drive with the update, which by the way, required registering an account with Yamaha. It's free, but what's the point? The update took about 10 minutes to complete. Afterward, I loaded up Toy Story 3 again, this time to different results.

It loaded, right up to the intro animation where you actually press play. The toys creeping from left to right in the intro were pixelated (more accurately, 2"x2" blocks of pixels) and hung repeatedly. I could hear the reader inside the unit hunting for the track, back and forth, over and over. So out came the disk, and what do you know? A single fingerprint. For the record, this disk had been in the old BD player for weeks, terminally on repeat before it croaked. That fingerprint never caused issue. Apparently this Yamaha is a tad more particular about cleanliness. (Save it A/V purists, I have a 2 year-old and yes, she gets her hands on everything. That's how the real world operates.) One wipe with a rag and presto! It works!

So far, here is my overall impression:

1. I'm glad I didn't pay Yamaha's MSRP of $600. Seriously, check it out.

2. You can get more features from Sony, Panasonic and LG for the same $$, if not less. Think 3D, Netflix, YouTube, Pandora, DLNA

3. The remote looks like it's from the late 80's

4. The unit loads a bit on the slower side, but it's not as bad as others have claimed

5. If you want anything mentioned in item 2, you don't want this unit

6. It's big, think it through. If space is tight then this isn't the model for you

7. The firmware updates require a PC, Internet, a blank CD or USB flash drive, a CD burner and registering at Yamaha's website

8. It includes the 7.1 analog outputs, a nice feature for those with older A/V gear

9. No SD Card slot. USB is on the back panel. It's difficult to reach in my setup

Bottom line for me, I'm not buying a 3D TV anytime soon, I have an Apple TV for YouTube, music and home movie playback so I'm fine without the streaming media capabilities of other similarly priced models from the big boys. This does what I wanted, for a decent price, and it does it pretty well. It's not perfect but face it people, it's a sub-$200 BD player... what do you expect from it?

Monday, February 10, 2014

Olympus VN-801PC Digital Voice Recorder

Olympus VN-801PC Digital Voice RecorderI use these digital voice recorders on a regular basis, having started with the 4200, then the 6200 and now this model. I bought this one after comparing it with the 8100, and didn't see how they differed except the 8100 comes with a cover. I haven't explored the extra features with the 801, but am impressed with it's recording capability, and the option to use either wma or mp3 formats. Some changes I like are: the speaker being on the front, the improved visibility on the screen, the wider body, controls, especially choosing what to erase and the additional memory, and adding the word 'power' to the hold control. It's a nice machine and well priced. We use it for basic language data recording.

Jim

The way I evaluate how easy to use a product is by looking (or in this case not looking at the manual, this product is sufficiently easy to use, I do not need to open its manual to start to use it right away.

First, the good points:

1. I find the microphone came with the recorder is very senstive and can pick up volume quite nicely from a distance, this is good for me as I bought this for recording my conference minutes.

2. It appears to be well made, I drop it once (already!) from 6 ft, and it did not appear to damage it.

Now, the not so good point:

The play back volume and speaker is not very good, in a quite room you certainly can hear it, but if you are in an outdoor environment or driving, forget it, the playback is not very good. you can crank up the volume but distortion will set in, I was thinking first, this may be the recording volume issue, but after I upload to my PC with better play back device, I know this is not the case, it is the recorder itself.

Update 3-5-2012

After several month use, I can tell you another not so good point about the recorder, it will eat battery (2x AAA) quickly, with a new set of battery, no recording but just playback, it will last 3 weeks in daily use for 40 minute a day, I consider this is not very efficient.

Buy Olympus VN-801PC Digital Voice Recorder Now

Pros:

The sound of recordings is exceptionally clear. This unit replaced a Sony and the battery life of this unit is FAR FAR superior. This unit powers down after a few minutes of no use. It can also power down manually. That saves battery life. The Sony has no way to shut it off other than removing a battery. I use this to record hour long lectures and the batteries in the Sony would last four lectures over four days before really needing to be recharged. The initial alkaline batteries in the Olympus have recorded well over a dozen lectures and the batteries are still strong.

Cons:

To record in MP3, which I do since I am sending the recordings to others (and some want to play on devices that don't play WMA files and those recipients are not technologically astute), means large file sizes for a one hour lecture. The file size at the worst recording level is about 16 MB for almost one hour. That is too large for some email recipients. Drop Box is an easy workaround.

Read Best Reviews of Olympus VN-801PC Digital Voice Recorder Here

I purchased this so that i could keep track of my random ideas throughout my day, and have now been using it to practice my interviewing skills. very easy to use, love that it records in chapters, impressed with how much it can store, and that I can save my digital files.

only thing that would improve this would be if it was rechargeable.

Want Olympus VN-801PC Digital Voice Recorder Discount?

I've been using this for about 1.5 years now, and I like it. The battery has yet to die and I've been able to intuit the instructions easily without needing to consult the manual constantly.

Actually, I went to turn it on while I was typing up this review and it's dead. So there you go. About 1.5 years from 2 AAA batteries.

It has a port for microphones, a port for earphones, and a usb port for downloading the audio files.

I've been using it to record myself instructing new hires with a throat mic and it has worked quite well.

My only complaints are:

The USB port is not covered and gets dirt and lint in it quite easily.

The "on" switch is a toggle, and it can get activated by accident if you aren't careful. I haven't had too much problem with this though.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Canon Vixia HF R300 Full HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 51x Advanced Zoom

Canon Vixia HF R300 Full HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 51x Advanced ZoomGot this Camcorder from my pre-order today, and like it so far, here are some of the things I have noticed so far.

Very small and light, similar to previous years models, I am using a Transcend 32GB class 10 card, which works just fine for it.

I plugged it in and can confirm that it takes about 2 and 1/2 hours to fully charge (my battery was completely dead when received)

Battery life is almost non-existent... I was surprised to read in the owner manual that when recording in FXP 1920x1080 mode that you could expect only about 25 minutes of battery life... I record in the slightly higher MXP mode and can also confirm that this is a pretty close guestimate as I have recorded around 10 15 minutes, and my battery indicator shows that it is at 50%, so more than one battery, or an extended battery will quickly become a must!

Also as the previous reviewer mentioned, the current title that amazon gives this camcorder "...with Dual SDXC Card Slots..." is incorrect, not an issue as I noticed this in the specs on Canon's web site before preordering it, but worth noting.

In all, video quality, as well as the IS modes make this camera wonderful to work with, and I love the videos that it produces!!

I purchased this camcorder when it was released and have used it for various projects. It is very pocketable, the video image stabilizer works well, the SD cards make it incredibly easy to transfer pictures to your computer and once you've selected the MPG settings that work best for you there's little left to chance. The zoom, color, exposure control, and even audio (I know, it's a consumer camcorder) is quite sufficient for most people who are looking for a great value in this price range.

But -far too many comments are based on the battery and not on the camcorder itself.

Buy they generic BP-727 two pack of batteries and get back to the camcorder.

BATTERY SOLUTION

The generic BP-727s and pair of chargers are EXTREMELY affordable. They are generally not chipped yet so the camcorder cannot tell you how much time you have left. I ran my own personal tests on a pair of full batteries and found that they provided 2hr 47min on the first battery and 2hr 53min on the second battery. If you start each day with a fully charged battery there is little need for the battery meter.

STORAGE

While a 32GB SDHC card works great for day of shooting this camcorder really shines with a larger capacity SDXC cards. I added a pair of 64GB SDXC cards to the rotation so I could carry a small 3-card aluminum wallet with me when travelling and not have to download for a week. SDXC is a great format but there will be those who will complain about compatibility and lack of functionality as well.

Understand that many of the would-be issues relate to the fact that the exFAT filesystem used on SDXC cards is not natively supported by Windows XP. You will need to install the Microsoft patch for XP that supports the exFAT (SDXC) formatted cards. After a reboot your card readers and SDXC cards will spring to life. That new memory card that you thought was incompatible or damaged now works like a champ.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE -If you are considering this camera because the features and price are attractive then do it. The battery and SDXC issues that have caused a great many people to feel disappointed can be corrected easily and with very little investment. Overlook every battery comment you see and look for comments on the camera, it's incredible zoom, decent low light performance, good audio and ability to accept a mic input and headphone output. It's a great camera that makes personal HD recordings easy to take and to share.

Buy Canon Vixia HF R300 Full HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 51x Advanced Zoom Now

I purchased this Camcorder on the day it came out and had high expectations. I had a number of Canon camcorders before and I really like their picture quality. However, when I used this one for the first time, I run out of battery after 20 minutes and had only about 12 minutes worth of footage. For a consumer product in this day and age, this is completely unacceptable. Also, the included software does not work on a Mac...

Read Best Reviews of Canon Vixia HF R300 Full HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 51x Advanced Zoom Here

Bought this camera as it was this years version of the Vixia R200 camera. The camera is fantastic! Image quality is great for the videos. You can download and view the videos on a mac computer, on the ps3, great. But then Canon, a brand that I really like, disappointed me completely with a battery that lasts 30 minutes tops!!! And the bigger replacement battery is 100+ dollars and I have no way of finding out if that one will last any longer.

I'm returning mine and will probably buy the R20 now. Which seems to have a longer battery life but I'll need to buy an extra one to get through the day anyway. Maybe I'll go with a different brand, still undecided.

Edit:

Fond some links at Canon's webpage that give insight in battery performances. All three possible batteries.

(...)

This one shows how long it takes to charge them. 7,5 Hours for the BP-727 on the camera!!! 7,5 hours!!

(...)

Want Canon Vixia HF R300 Full HD Flash Memory Camcorder with 51x Advanced Zoom Discount?

I have been using a Sony HC-3 High Definition Camcorder since 2006 with very good results. The HC-3 records to mini-DV tapes. I purchased the R300 to save time by not having to deal with the hassle and expense of finding and using tape. To transfer two hours of video to my computer from the HC-3 it takes an additional two hours. The Canon HF R300 records to files of a number of different resolutions, compressions and formats. Many can be used without any re-encoding before being either uploaded to YouTube or written to Blueray discs. This is a huge time saver for me and the primary reason that I purchased this camcorder.

It does come stock with a very small battery and I understand other users frustrations. I have always purchased at least a couple of extra batteries immediately for every camcorder that I have ever purchased. Taking video and especially high definition video has always been a power hungry application. Most of the video that I take is actually in auditoriums; the first thing that I do is try to find a good spot that has both a good view of the stage and a power outlet. I have always had issues with batteries giving out on me at the most inopportune times.

I purchased my Vixia in a bundle that included an additional OEM medium capacity battery, a case, and an 8gig SD card. I immediately purchased two additional generic high capacity batteries and a wall charger for $24 including shipping. With three extra batteries I have the battery capacity that I need even if I am not able to park myself next to an outlet during an event and I got it all at a price that I cannot even mention here on Amazon because it was so low.

My Sony HC-3 has a 1/3" CMOS sensor and it had the best low light capabilities of any consumer camcorder in 2006. The Canon HF R300 has a smaller 1/4.85" CMOS with more pixels, so it is at a disadvantage because each pixel is receiving a smaller amount of light at a given brightness level. However there have been improvements in both pixel sensitivity and density over the years and the Canon HF R300 while not quite as good as some higher priced camcorders in low light... is more than adequate for what I use it for. The results are very similar to my Sony HC-3. For what I use it for the most the 30x zoom lens is a very big plus as compared to the 10x lens in my Sony HC-3 and the more expensive Canons. I am willing to give up a little in low light sensitivity for the more powerful zoom.

For my purposes the ability to plug in an external microphone or the line out of a PA system or mixer is essential. Every camcorder that I have purchased over the past 30 years has always had the capability to plug in an external sound source or microphone. The Sony HC-3 did not initially have a mic jack but both bluetooth mics and a mic jack adapter was available which added the mic or line input through the hot shoe. An external mic jack is generally available on most high end camcorders, but on less expensive camcorders this is one of the first options to be dropped. So I am very grateful that the Canon HF R300 has both an external mic jack and a headphone jack.

Every camcorder in this price range is going to have a few compromises. Mine came bundled with adequate batteries and I purchased additional high capacity batteries and a wall charger for a nominal amount so I do not consider that to be a negative. My assumption is that Canon will most likely include a larger battery on this coming years model. I would have appreciated a hot shoe for powered accessories such as a light or bluetooth microphone. This camcorder has a lot of options and adjustments that can be accessed through the menu system; it would have been nice if a few of these could have been accessed through programmable buttons. I also would have loved a LANC terminal so that I could control the Zoom and other functions from a tripod.

Overall this is an incredible camcorder for the price. It has too many features to list in my review. I especially appreciate the choice in file formats, frame rates, resolution and compression. This allows a user to easily burn a DVD that will play HD video in a blueray player without re-encoding. It also allows one to upload HD content to YouTube without re-encoding. This is a feature that is a big improvement over the prior years comparable Canon Camcorders. Inexplicably this major improvement is not mentioned in most reviews, but will save me hours of time and frustration. This is an incredibly versatile camcorder with a lot of hidden bells and whistles. It records very good video and has an easy to use automatic mode, but enough options to keep a more experienced user happy.

**** follow up after several months ****

After using the Vixia R300 for several months... I am happy to report back that it has performed flawlessly for my purposes. The most useful "upgrade" that I made was buying a stereo bluetooth sender and receiver set designed for using headphones wirelessly with your stereo. The range can be up to 300 feet depending on whether there are obstructions or other sources of interference. One plugs the line out of a PA system into the sender and the receiver's stereo output into the mic jack on the R300. You then monitor the sound using a pair of headphones.

There are several options for setting the sound levels using the internal controls on the R300 and the volume controls on the bluetooth wireless headset adapter. Since the headset adapter has aa female input and so does the camcorder you need to buy a short 1/8" stereo mini-cable with males on both ends for the camcorder side and a rca to stereo mini adapter for the line out side. I also set up a wireless microphone with the same system for situations where there is no PA. It all works extremely well... far better than the proprietary sony system that I have been using for the past several years with my Sony HC-3 HD Camcorder.

My only frustration is that I have not been able to find a 12v car adapter that can be plugged into the camcorder. This is a minor issue, because I can use a small inverter with the normal charger. I would like the option of plugging the camcorder into a small portable 12v source when it indicates that my battery life is nearly up. The charging plug on the camcorder is some type of proprietary plug that does not seem to be readily available, otherwise I would just make up my own.

Monday, January 20, 2014

Geovision GV-800A-16 16 Channel GV Hybird DVR Capture Card

Geovision GV-800A-16 16 Channel GV Hybird DVR Capture CardWhen I started my security camera installation company back in 2001, Geovision was the first product I sold and installed for my customers. At the time it was revolutionary because it worked so well out of the box and the card installation was easy. My only problem with it then is that it did not give me the resolution I was looking for. After years of experimenting with other camera DVR's and cards, I came back to Geovision and found out that it wasn't Geovision that was giving me a substandard resolution, it was the cheap cameras I was installing. I feel that Geovision packed every feature you will ever use without demanding a lot from your computer your installing it into. I've used some pretty cheap computers for DVR's and Geovision has never let me down. Other cards use up too many motherboard assets including the onboard video card. Geovision even has an app to allow you to watch your camera system on your I-Phone. It's in Beta testing now but I have installed it for a couple of customers and found it to be the coolest feature yet! It even controls Pan, Tilt and Zoom cameras as well!

This is a knock off card which means some plant in China made this card it is not a true Geovision product. The worst part is when I put it in I had to set the region code to Canada to make it work. Now I have wasted over $500 bucks on a piece of crap card and I have a customer who needs the system in and running by tomorrow. I don't have time to wait for another card and to wait for a refund. I really wish people would explain that they are selling a knock off card and put that price point at about $100 which is what they are worth. Video quality is terrible and there is herringbone in the screen for each camera which tells me there is a voltage differential for the camera video controller chip. This is not a Geovision product it even comes with a burnt DVD with old software not the newest version of the software.

Buy Geovision GV-800A-16 16 Channel GV Hybird DVR Capture Card Now

Friday, December 27, 2013

Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite

Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite
  • Edit and produce movies with special effects and transitions
  • Create DVDs and Blu-ray Disc media with custom menus and graphics
  • Share movies on PSP, iPod, iPhone, online, and more
  • Follow along with Show Me How tutorials and learn as you go
  • Includes 360 exclusive music soundtracks

I have been a Vegas Movie Studio user for three versions now. Each one just gets better and better.

"Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite" comes with three separate programs and some very cool extras thrown in.

You get Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 to do all your editing and video making,

DVD Architect Studio to make your DVD's and BluRay Discs,

and Sound Forge Audio Studio which is a stand alone audio recording and editing studio great for Podcasters and anyone making voice overs for talking books or tutorials.

With this production suite version comes a new bonus 3D Text Generator and extra 3D Transitions and Effects from NewBlueFx. The biggest addition to Version 11 is a new "Title and Text" tool that gives you the ability to create animated text titles. Also you can now edit true 3D Video and import more types of video from DSLR cameras -which is becoming very popular now with videographers.

I have been using Version 11 of the program continuously, and have NOT experienced any major problems so far. I am using a newly built computer with the new i7-2600k CPU and Windows 7 64bit OS and also use an older laptop running Vista OS. I have made plenty of 1080p HD projects 60-90 minutes in length, and the program has been working just fine. Sometimes I experience small glitches, but what program is perfect 100% of the time?

Please don't be scared off by the negative reviews that have started to come in, and I am sure will continue to pile up over time.

Some of the reasons why people may experience problems and crashes with this program is because:

-Their computer is not fast enough to process HD video

-Lack of memory (RAM) and too many junk programs and basic crap clogging up the computer and causing software conflicts

-Trying to process a far too complex project in one sitting (Movie Studio is only a 32bit program)

One gripe I do have with Sony Creative Software is that the minimum computer requirements stated for Vegas to work properly are a gross understatement. Their minimum requirements are only useful for people who work with Standard Definition video, which is going the way of the dinosaurs. If you own a HD Video Camera that produces AVCHD video, and you want to edit that video smoothly with no computer crashes, then you need to have a fast and modern computer. Your CPU needs to be a FOUR Core processor running at 3.0GHz minimum. You may be on a three year old computer right now that's probably not going to be good enough. Intel and AMD now have new CPU's which are built to handle the huge processing power that HD Video requires, so if you are serious about video editing using Vegas MS11, upgrade your computer to that latest specs.

Vegas Movie Studio is not for the faint hearted there is a steep learning curve to climb. Most problems in Vegas have easy solutions and there are some great resources out there (Forums & YouTube) now that can teach you how to use this program without too many headaches all you have to do is ask for help from the many experienced users who post online. If you are hopeless with computers and have no patience with problem solving, then this program is not for you stick with Windows Movie Maker. Why I love this program so much, is because it contains many features from Pro level video editing software that would cost up to six times more than this great value package.

All the best.

p.s.

I don't work for Sony, I just really love this program because it has taught me so much and allowed me to be very creative without spending thousands of dollars.

If you have any concerns as to whether this program is going to work with your computer and do what you want, then do the smart thing first and download the FREE 30 day trial direct from Sony Creative Software then you will know whether to buy it from Amazon or not how easy is that?

***UPDATE as of August 2012***

New Version of this Suite has now been released.

The suite which I just reviewed has been given a slight name change and is now called "Movie Studio Platinum 12 Suite".

This newer version is now a 64 bit program!!!

So if you have a 64bit Windows Operating System, I would encourage you to have a serious look at the newer Version 12.

It can now use ALL available RAM installed on your computer, whereas V11 was capped at only 4GBs.

Also has GPU Acceleration, which means V12 can now utilize the power of your Graphics Card to Speed Up rendering times and improve playback quality in the Preview Window.

Buy Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite Now

This review is for brand new beginners like me. I've never used any of the many software programs for video capture or editing. A friend told me that Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum was the easiest and least buggy. BTW, I don't know what the word Platinum refers to or, for that matter, if there is a silver or gold version. Everyone but this one friend told me to shut up and buy a mac in order to use Imovie. I ended up going with Vegas rather than buying a new computer just to edit video.

Here's what I've noticed in the first week of use: I was overwhelmed reading the instruction manual but then I stumbled onto the incredible sony training website. Sony provides a website dedicated to training for an earlier version of this program-

This training website had a minor problem: I couldn't figure out the "plug in" update stuff, which I think does something to your browser to enable you to watch these training videos. However, it is easy to download each training video to your computer to play whenever you want, without dealing with those plug ins. Click on the word "download" toward the bottom left of your browser if the "plug in" stuff doesn't work on your computer. There are 12 training videos, each of which is about 3-5 minutes long. Even though the training videos were for Movie Studio 9 rather than 11, they provided everything I needed to make a ten minute short video project that includes Hi Def video and older clips that are not Hi Def. My project also included photos and had background music.

Using Movie Studio Platinum seems pretty easy for this novice--ONCE I found those training videos from that website. The program in its original box also came with an extra DVD loaded with training videos. These were good but should be viewed AFTER the ones on that website. Finally, the program itself has a "show me how" button, which literally walks beginners through editing their own video. Arrows pop up and point you to the exact spots you need to click when working with your video and audio. This was a great addition to the training videos.

Another note about that training website--If you happen to scroll around the various sonycreativesoftware websites, don't make the mistake I did: Vegas is a word used in at least two completely separate software programs that have almost the same name. One is this "movie studio" program, which is in the hundred dollar range. The other is called Vegas Pro, which I think is a much more expensive and advanced version of Movie Studio.

If you watch the website training videos and the accompanying DVD videos, you're out about 90 minutes. But that's all I needed to use the program the way most people will probably use it--to make cool vacation or family event videos that are 15 or 20 minutes long. Again, I'm a beginner and don't envision myself using this more than a few times a year.

Nothing has been buggy and my computer has not frozen or crashed. Maybe it's important to know that my computer is a 2011 PC running windows 7. You should also know that I am not using the Vegas Movie Studio 11 version that was in the box--Vegas prompted me to upload the latest version, which probably included fixes to the original that came in the box.

SIX MONTH UPDATE: I have now used the program for six months. Not one crash. My favorite use for it involves archiving old mini-DV video. I captured these clips into a hard drive but they are unreadable for most players that attach to TV sets. For this reason, I import them into Vegas and render them as "mpeg 2 NTSC Widescreen" files, which are readable by various players. Another render option is "Sony AVC/Memory stick SD NTSC widescreen 6256 KB" but some players won't play this file type.

The Vegas program renders the video very fast, about 20 minutes for a 25 minute video using the computer I mentioned above. These old clips look great on modern TV's. I play them on my TV using a WD NET TV player, which has a USB input where I attach a one TB Hard Drive. No more DVD's, which don't play as clearly as these files. Instead, I have at least a hundred family videos on that 1 TB hard drive. My newer videos are in the AVCHD format, which is a Sony Hi Def format. The program is much slower rendering these HI Def videos, about 40 minutes for a 10 minute clip. I try to limit the final clips to not much more than a gigabyte so that the video player attached to my TV doesn't get overwhelmed.

After seeing the difference and ease comparing .mpeg 2 files in a modern player/hard drive combo to a traditional DVD player, I think most of us will be tossing our DVD's in 5 years. It's like comparing an Ipod to a CD player. The newer AVCHD videos look ridiculously good and are far superior to DVD's. I think they even look better than blue ray. Because this Vegas program is so good, I've decided to use Sony cameras to take video because the file interchange is seamless. My camera is called a Sony HX9, which creates amazing Hi Def clips.

Addendum: Below is the link to training website for the earlier version of Vegas that I described in my review. As I mentioned above, you can download each video if you can't play them the usual way by clicking on each one. When you click on a video and see something about "plug in's not working", there is an option on the bottom left to "download". These downloaded versions play fine in Windows Media Player.

Read Best Reviews of Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite Here

Brief and to the point: Reviewed Corel pro/Pinnacle, Adobe and Sony. I did the trials.

Sony was the most easy to manipulate and had the most bells and whistles. It did not crash when I rendered to DVD or to Youtube or to IMDB (IMDB's got some upload rules).

Yes, there's a lot of information, but I went to Sony and found "support" under there is "training" and under that was webinars. I watched three webinars and all the training videos.

I am a novice and did have to figure out the windows.

For the money: their features, their interface and they way things work ESPECIALLY: "SHOW ME HOW!" are brilliant.

NO, I do not work for them. I have nothing to do with Sony, but I do read all the post to see what people say and that adds to my buying decision. Given the choices and support, I take Sony. I bought the suite and saved nearly $40 ($124.95 on Sony--why, no idea, because I printed both spec sheets and compared notes: they were the same). So, if you're looking for video editing software and you're just starting...this software works. If you, like me, are looking to grow and not to get to a point where the software is no long viable, then buy Sony.

Adobe was out of my price range and didn't have the features.

Pinnacle had too many consumer complaints about bad service.

Corel kept crashing when I imported video (yes, contacted corel support, went to the website, did an update and it crashed again---sent it back)

I wish you well and recommend: do the downloads--trials. Then you get a real taste. I'm lovin the Sony Vegas Pro 11.

Good luck!

Want Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 Production Suite Discount?



I still have some kinks to work out, but it does just about everything I need a video editor to do.

Save 51% Off

Sony Movie Studio HD Platinum Suite 11 V. 11 is great. It comes with so much stuff besides the actual software, like 1,001 sound effects, 23 borders, 31 illustrations, 414 songs, and 42 title cards that can be used for anything. What more can you ask for? The video editing software is hard to use at first, but the "Show Me How" built-in tutorials help out with that, and once you get the hang of the software it really is amazing. You have plenty of effects and transitions to really make your videos pop and look amazing. This program has not lagged or crashed on me at all, which is great! I advise this product to anyone looking for an affordable, professional grade movie editor. If you want something simple to use, then I advise something else, just because its not that easy to use for those looking for a program to do it all for them. If you're a striving videographer or movie maker/editor and want to make your videos professional looking, this is definitely a good choice.

TIP: If you do buy this product, the sound effects, songs, ect. are not automatically put onto your computer. You need to browse the disc and under the "Content" folder you'll find all the stuff. Just highlight all the folders within the "Content" folder, and copy them to a folder on your computer that you wish to have the files at.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Motorola V265 Phone (Verizon Wireless)

Motorola V265 PhoneBefore I review the phone itself, a few words about Verizon. Their new plans count peak time till 9PM, not 8PM as it used to be. Even if you get more minutes, you're effectively loosing 20 hrs or so a month, and virtually eliminate night-time savings when calling East Coast M-F from the West Coast. This information is well hidden from prospective subscribers. Calling voicemail costs air-time minutes make sure you program the phone to dial it automatically for speed. Their customer service has been easy to contact and pleasant to deal with, but there were numerous problems and mistakes that needed to be addressed when activating the phones and when reviewing the bills. Read your bill carefully.

This stylish phone is quite well designed when it comes to integrating the variety of features it offers. There is, however, one glaring (no pun intended) flaw: the color screen is completely useless in daylight. I don't mean that it is difficult to read. It is impossible to read at all. No matter how you shield it with your hand, or try to find some shade; if there is more light than what you normally find indoors, the display simply looks as if it were turned off. There is no brightness adjustment, so it's not a question of setting the phone correctly. The only thing to be done is to find direct strong sunlight and then manipulate the phone just so, and maybe you will get a reading from this display as the sun rays reflect from the display's surface. Once indoors, or at night, there is no problem. The display then looks quite impressive and is functional.

If outdoor viewing is rather handicapped, you do get compensated with a choice of wallpapers and screen savers for the display!

Don't get excited about taking pictures with this phone. They are extremely poor quality. And yet, this is a gimmick pushed by both Motorola (the manual explains picture taking before anything else!) and Verizon, which wants you to pay some eight bucks a month to send up to 20 of these to other people. Someone is apparently joking around here.

I have two of these phones. One of them has a somewhat brighter screen than the other, which makes manufacturing tolerances questionable. Again, brightness is not adjustable only the duration of backlighting is. One of the phones initially had a problem with the display, but after wiggling the cover several times, the contacts apparently mated and now it works fine. However, the button backlighting turns itself off when you hit a key now and then, on either phone someone working on power management has opted for reversed logic.

The speaker phone cannot be turned on if the headset is plugged in. This makes it inconvenient if you want someone else to hear the conversation while you are using the headset. If you have the headset plugged in, folding the phone does not drop the connection the phone disconnects only when it detects the other end of the line terminate the call. Be carefull and use the END key.

Entering text can get complicated, even though Motorola tried to make it easy with their we-will-guess-as-you-type smarts more confusing than useful. But once you get used to the basics of text entering, it's not too bad (except for that disapearing key backlighting I mentioned).

Voice dialing works poorly the phone usually does not recognize what one is saying. My old Samsung did much better than this unit (to put it simply, Samsung was useable, while this one is not). Also, it takes longer to dial with voice: you have to state a function first, than a name, each time having a little "conversation" with the phone's synthetic ego. A nice demo-level functionality, but quite useless in the field. The exercise gets even rediculous if you enter a person's name that's not common in English: the phone will insist that you pronounce it the way the voice synthesizer chooses to pronounce it, which means you either have to intentionally misspel it or else intentioanally mispronounce it. My old Samsung simply asked you to record your own pronounciation of an entry and then tried (quite reliably) to match it when you spoke it again while voice dialing.

The selection of ring sounds offers a bunch of MIDI tunes that sound absolutely horrendous. Try using some of the more basic choices or else risk being taken for a moron by the public around you. Again, the corporate types want to steer you towards downloading more sounds and tunes for additional money.

On the more positive note, the phone is stylish and convenient to use in other ways. The keypad and navigation buttons work very well. I like the single key speed dialing but you have to dig deep into the manual to discover this feature. I also like that you can browse contacts, etc. while talking on line. In the dark the unit looks impressive and menus are thought out well. The speaker phone mode actually works. The contacts database is well designed, and you get a calendar and a calculator for good measure. The interface is quite customizable.

But keep in mind that the plethora of functions can be overwhelming. This is not a gadget for technically challenged people.

The reception quality is fine. Typically, you can hear people better (actually very well) than they can hear you. The headset that comes with the "Essentials Pack" works well and is easy to wear, but keeping the plug close to the ear canal can be a bit problematic. The leather cover looks nice and fits well, but has a tendency to quickly collect moisture between the display's surface and the transparent plastic that goes over it.

I am giving it only 3 stars for taking a giant step backward in display usability and substandard voice dialing capability, both of which were implemented better three years ago on other phones using less advanced technologies. Cheap thrills driven by greed are unbecoming and embarrasing. If you can live with these limitations, go for it, you may actually end up enjoying it a lot for other reasons.

I bought the Motorola V265 phone with Verizon service in May on sale on Amazon for $99, with a $50 Verizon rebate and a $150 Amazon rebate. So this phone rates super good as far as cost is concerned (assuming the rebates come in OK, which is a big IF). 1 year contract, 450 minutes for $39.99/month.

For comparison, my old phone was a Nokia 5165, with AT&T Wireless (now Cingular) as the provider. I'm a low minutes user, but this is mostly because I got horrible reception at home.

I live in Falmouth, MA. The region isn't well-covered by cell towers, and is moderately hilly with dense tree growth. Add to that, the fact that I live at the edge of a bay. So cell strength is a big deal for me. I spoke with co-workers and cell phone accessory retailers and most said that for the street I live on Verizon had the best coverage, although it still wasn't that great.

==== Phone Minuses ====

-It seems to have a short battery life, although I plan to test this with more rigor and see how it stacks up to the advertised specs.

-The sound quality is a little tinny. The Nokia was more far-away and hollow sounding. The sound quality can't stand a candle to even a cheap corded land-line phone.

-The camera is pretty awful, but I didn't expect much. Plus you have to pay extra to get your pictures from the phone to your computer.

-The extendable antennae doesn't seem to add too much to the signal strength, and seems like it would break easily.

-The volume and speakerphone buttons are in an inconvenient place on the side and they are always in the way of my thumb.

-The buttons are too small and I'm a person with small hands, too! Other button configurations have seemed easier to use. I liked the raised rubber-ish buttons of my old Nokia better, and even some of the flat-ish buttons that rocked a little.

-There's no protective cover for the camera lens.

==== Phone Pluses ====

-Lots of features to delve into, many I will probably rarely ever use but it's nice to know they're there.

-I absolutely love the speakerphone feature.

-A must-have feature for me is an external phone jack. A lot of phone models I looked at in stores, while they had the port for the external jack, the actual electronics weren't connected. Having this jack means that I can go to an electronics store like Radio Shack and buy an external antenna (and the proper connecter) and get a better signal. So far, Verizon's signal is OK as compared with AT&T/Cingular.

-I like the external display; having the black & white contrast helps readability but like most screens I've tested doesn't do well in direct sunlight.

==== Verizon Service Pluses (as compared to AT&T Wireless/Cingular) ====

-They seem to take more of an effort at making sure I'm satisfied. We'll see how long this lasts. I have my doubts.

-I was able to port my existing phone number without hassle and the procedure took about a half-hour taling to a customer service person on the phone.

-The signal strength at my house is much better. With AT&T Wireless/Cingular, I could not make outgoing phone calls sitting on my living room couch. With Verizon, I can actually make calls, although the clarity is not great. Because of restrictive zoning laws here, most companies share towers, so I suspect the difference is a matter of one critically placed tower.

==== Verizon Service Minuses ====

**** Verizon started charging me monthly fees BEFORE the phone arrived in the mail! ****

Apparently, if you buy the phone through a third party like Amazon, they deem service to start at the date of purchase, rather than the date the phone is actually turned on, presumably because Verizon can't control the actions of the third party. I asked a Verizon customer service person nicely, and they agreed to prorate the bill for the difference between the date of purchase and the date of delivery. The refund did show up on the next bill.

-The billing cycle for the monthly service charges is for the month ahead rather than the month just prior (as AT&T/Cingular had done). This is likely to cause problems when I decide to end service (see below).

==== FOR AT&T WIRELESS/CINGULAR CUSTOMERS ====

I have had tremendous problems on the AT&T/Cingular end of the porting process.

First, the customer service number (800-888-7600) that's on my bill keeps spitting me into the Cingular phone menu. To get around this, one customer service person said, at the prompt to enter your wireless number enter a dummy number (like 000-000-0000) to get into the AT&T service area. There is one other hitch. Apparently the AT&T phone menu dumps you into the GSM department. If you have digital service (like I did), you will need to find a way to get to a person in the Digital department (I never was able to do that using the phone menu options).

***** Second, AT&T/Cingular billed me for a full month's montly service charge even when I ended service in the middle of the billing cyle!!! *******

I called several times, most times not even able to access a person who could deal with AT&T accounts. So I did some web research.

I found that in March 2004 AT&T Wireless was sued in a class-action lawsuit for doing this very thing. In the lawsuit AT&T Wireless was accused of violating the Federal Communications Act and imposing an "unjust and unreasonable" charge by assessing the full monthly charges after switching to another provider before the end of the billing month. Apparently, just recently (in May I think) AT&T Wireless settled out of court. I think this would have been huge had it gone to trial.

So, with this information at hand I managed to finally reach a customer service person who could handle AT&T accounts. I asked nicely to have the bill prorated. She said no. I told her about the lawsuit, explained that I'd like AT&T to do the right thing, and she finally relented. She later confided that making the change to have the bill prorated was up to the discression of the customer service rep (!!) so be nice and polite when you ask.

On a side note about Verizon: people at my office have had problems with Verizon billing them multiple times for the same call, so be sure to check your statements.

==== FOR EVERYBODY ====

Depending on the terms of your agreement, you may be liable for a full month's service charge when you change services, even if you stop service a day after the new billing cycle begins. Keep this in mind when you port your old number.

*** Be sure to read your service agreement with a fine-toothed comb. You will probably need to spend a couple hours to fully understand it and it will feel like you're back in school in a foreign-language class. BUT YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE CONTRACT. If you don't understand something, get a customer service person to help you. Just like with credit card companies, if it's in the contract, you gotta pay it. ***

Buy Motorola V265 Phone (Verizon Wireless) Now

What i like about this phone is it's excellent sound quality. The speakerphone is incredibly good. It's even clearer than using earphone. However, the digital camera sucks. You'll never use it. But if this is not what you want, it doesn't matter. Someone criticize v265 that the backlight of key pad sometimes doesn't light up and think this is an error. Actually, this is because the phone is set to power save mode, which automatically turns off the backlight of keypad if there is sufficient light.

The LCD screen is bad. You could barely see what it shows under sunlight.

i rated 5 stars since the phone is the best in all fundamental qualities of being a cell phone, such as the sound quality & reception.

Read Best Reviews of Motorola V265 Phone (Verizon Wireless) Here

This phone is smaller and lighter than the more expensive v710. If you don't need bluetooth, a higher megapixel camera and video capability, then the v265 is the phone to get. Keep in mind that in order to e-mail the pictures you take with any camera phone, you will need to pay extra on your Verizon account for this service. Verizon makes money on this but it doesn't mean you have to pay for this extra service if you don't want to use it.

The Motorola v265 phone does what it's supposed to do and I agree that the Verizon network is the best in many areas of the USA. The analog capability of this phone is a real plus if you like to take road trips away from major metropolitan areas. You'll still have service where digital only phones and providers will be totally useless.

Small and light, works well and priced right. In many ways, it's even superior to the much more expensive V710; it's smaller and some have even said the audio quality/reception is better with the v265. In fact, I can hardly believe how good the mic quality is. People I call can often not even tell that I'm on a cellphone! This is a huge improvment over my old cellphone and I'm a happy camper. A good value in my book.

Want Motorola V265 Phone (Verizon Wireless) Discount?

This is a great little phone for the money. I originally had the same problem with viewing the screen in the daylight but resolved it by changing the background wallpaper to none and changing the color scheme so the background is now white. This makes the screen easy to read in all but direct sunlight. Turning my back to the sun is sufficient to see the screen well.